10 Things We Didn’t Learn From Enron Scandal, 10 Years After

We didn’t, but we still could and we still should.”

10. I would argue that at best, the firm smelled very bad.”

“Some people like them a lot, but they’re just so complex. Skilling was sentenced to 45 years in prison and fined $45 million.

8. Skilling was alleged to have dumped $15.5 million in Enron stock in an insider trade more than two months before the company declared bankruptcy. Regulators and the regulated continue their dance

That’s the good news, Roe said.

1. Today banks have refused to devalue their troubled assets, say some economists.

If you increase capital requirements for financial institutions, you decrease risk, Elkind said.

“For Enron, the firm was growing at a fantastic rate and the question was how were they doing it? The answer, one knows with hindsight, was they were committing massive fraud,” he said. “The outright fraud of the type that was the core of Enron’s ultimate collapse — bogus transactions that generated accounting entries but not real profits — was contained after Enron (even if other frauds, like Madoff’s arose).”

Weiss said the Sarbanes Oxley Act, which created new standards for accounting firms, boards and management, was a “clear overreaction” to the Enron scandal, which is “understandable.” Weiss said good and bad came as a result of its passage in 2002.

Enron allowed its chief financial officer, Andrew Fastow, to set up a fund called LJM and engage in suspect deals that made Enron’s books look better, Levin said. Excessive leverage is as dangerous as a bad bet

Weiss said one could not understand how Enron valued things, or management had discretion in the valuations which allowed management to choose their profit number.

The company’s 20,000 employees lost not only their jobs and medical insurance but retirement savings in company stock. Many say regulators need teeth to enforce rules and weed out shady accounting. In Enron, and more recent cases like GM and Lehman, this really seemed to surprise some investors. Next, it was difficult if not impossible to understand exactly how the firm made money.

Corporations still use accounting tricks to hide debt. We need to create the right incentives to keep people honest – or at least not afraid to speak out.”

Stephen Lubben, law professor at Seton Hall University School of Law, said recent years have also shown the limits of the ever-increasing disclosure obligations imposed on companies.

Opinions over the role of regulators are mixed. Enron executives Kenneth Lay, Jeff Skilling and Andrew Fastow — all convicted of white collar crimes — emblemized the bad side of the one percent before the term existed.

“One of the things most people forget about Enron, it wasn’t an outlier,” he said, explaining that it engaged in risky activities with venerated banks.

First, Weiss said, the cash flows did not match the profits even after many years which should have raised a red flag. It was his CFO, Andrew Fastow, allegedly idolized Skilling, and did his part to cook the books, hiding billions of dollars in debt.

Weiss said at the most basic level, the key lesson from the South Sea Bubble, Enron, and Madoff Ponzi scheme is knowing whether a business itself makes sense.

“One lesson we haven’t learned from Enron is that corporations will engage in conflicts of interest, and some won’t stop until action is taken,” he said.

Elkind said regulatory agencies need to have the weapons and funding to closely monitor new, ever more powerful financial instruments.

Lubben said the recent financial crisis showed that small investors still do not fully understand where shareholders stand in the priority line — the “food chain” — of large corporations.

Before the bankruptcy of WorldCom in 2002, Enron’s bankruptcy was the largest in U.S. In the years after Enron was exposed, companies like Goldman Sachs and Citibank set up synthetic CDOs, sold shares in them to clients, and then made money betting against their own clients.. In 2001 Enron employees lost $1.2 billion in retirement funds and $2 billion in pension funds while Enron’s top execs cashed in $116 million in stock, according to the film, “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room.” The average severance pay was $4,500 while the top executives were paid bonuses totaling $55 million.

9. Enron allegedly made prepay deals worth billions of dollars, such as pretending to engage in energy swaps with other companies but they were actually dealing with offshore companies that were banks, in essence to receive loans. Instead of the massive amount of documents can’t we do one thing at a time, isolate and make it clear, so we have a sense of the repercussions?”

“Just because it’s a big respectable bank, don’t think they’re not into gambling,” Gibney said.

“You’re not so far out on the ledge,” he said.

6. “Often that means they don’t get paid at all. history. Lawyers, bankers, auditors and many employees saw stuff that they knew was wrong or was suspicious and said little or nothing. Corporate leadership makes all the difference in the world–for good and for bad

“When you pass these laws, it adds a level of complexity that is hard for many companies, especially small companies,” he said. “This then begs the question of whether it was obvious at the time. Okay, but how did these people create the wealth? What exactly were they doing? Trading energy, trading weather futures, trading broadband,” he said. If it’s too good to be true, it probably is

Weiss said the same could be said of the Dodd-Frank Act, or Obama’s healthcare plan.

Peter Elkind, editor at large with Fortune magazine, investigative reporter and co-author of Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron with Bethany McLean, said business, especially the financial world, can’t be left to regulate itself.

“The changes made after Enron did little to avoid the shocking failures at AIG and other financial companies,” he said. Still building fragile financial structures

Once the darling of Wall Street, Enron was the country’s seventh-largest company with a soaring stock price that grew more than 100 percent in 2000. Important names make mistakes too

“These frauds don’t happen in a vacuum,” Weiss said in agreement. Higher capital requirements and less leverage reduce the danger of a catastrophe.

“We muddled through and avoided more Enron-type frauds and collapses, which isn’t bad. But we still built, and we’re still building, too many fragile financial structures that fail too often.”

Olympus managed to hide losses for two decades and admitted only recently to doing so. The company collapsed in a matter of months as the media and the public became aware of its faulty accounting and business practices.

Many transactions — ultimately at the collapse of the company — involved some of the largest banks in the country.

In 2006, Skilling was convicted of 19 criminal counts, including one count of insider trading, related to his role in the massive fraud. Conflicts of interest continue to occur

“We could have taken a deep look at the special purpose vehicles, derivatives, repos, and the rest of the ‘new’ finance that was core to Enron’s business model, in order to see what needed to be done better,” Mark Roe, professor at Harvard Law School, said. Many in the business community say business regulation is doing more harm than good for an already fragile economy.

Examples include Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers in the run-up to the financial crisis and MF Global’s implosion just recently, he said.

“We did learn some lessons and people were more careful, but greed creeps back in again,” said Lawrence Weiss, professor of international accounting at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

“The risks that traders take pose risks for all of us,” he said.

2. Obviously this is a problem in all bankruptcy cases, but it is especially acute in a situation where a big, well-known company fails will little warning.”

Given the lopsided votes in favor of the law, Weiss said it was likely not well-read by lawmakers before it was passed.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the permanent subcommittee on investigations which reported on the role of Enron’s board and investment banks’ response to lessons learned from Enron, said the Enron scandal did not put an end to corporate malfeasance..

“If it looks too good to be true it probably is, or people’s inherent greed often gets the better of their judgment,” he said.

3. “Lots of people were aware or should have been aware. Names like AIG and WorldCom may have replaced Enron in the vernacular when referring to corporate meltdowns and greed. “At some level, we might be better off with a simple cigarette-style warning — this investment is not guaranteed; you could lose all of your money — than the phone book style SEC reports that are currently distributed to investors.”

“Conflicts of interest will continue to plague Wall Street until regulators use the new Dodd-Frank provisions to prohibit them,” he said.

Ten years after the energy and commodities firm Enron collapsed under the weight of a massive fraud, much has changed about how corporate America does business and much, unfortunately, has remained the same, with new frauds and excessive risk-taking exposed all too frequently.

Elkind said companies must clearly disclose the risks they are taking and regulators need to require them to do so.

“The basic answer is that a common shareholder only gets paid if everyone else has been paid,” he said. “We could have taken the opportunity to preserve the valuable in the new finance and carve out the excess. Preferred stockholders get preferred treatment

Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling reportedly led the company’s risky bets to revolutionize the market for natural gas and commodities trading. “And they could do this and make a fortune, and no one could copy it? How was it shown on their financial statements?”

Alex Gibney, filmmaker who produced “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,” said the big lesson that wasn’t learned was Enron was aided and abetted by the most important investment banks in America and around the world.

“After Enron, we could have, but didn’t, take the opportunity to re-think what’s the core of what’s economically valuable in managing risk in the derivatives business and financing firms via repos and special purpose vehicles,” Roe said. Unlike Enron, Olympus came clean on its own.

7. “You probably could have gotten benefit of Sarbanes Oxley with a smaller law that avoided the pitfalls that companies complain about.”

“They employed brilliant people

CNN.com – ‘Rings’ odds-on Oscar favorite

But the Academy Awards garner about 1,500 bettors each year.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) will announce the nominations for the 76th Academy Awards on January 27, 2004.

Odds-posting and gaming Web site says Tolkien’s tops

In fact, BetWWTS.com also is offering a whole slew of wagers surrounding Wednesday’s opening of “The Return of the King.” The over-under for the film’s three-day opening, for example, is $65 million, and it’s heavily favored to beat the five-day opening tally of slightly more than $102 million for its predecessor, “The Two Towers.”


.

Follow the news that matters to you. Create your own alert to be notified on topics you’re interested in.

Or, visit Popular Alerts for suggestions.

Rings

Elijah Wood has played Frodo Baggins in all three “Lord of the Rings” films. The final chapter in the trilogy is due December 17.

Rounding out the field of favorites for a best picture nomination are, in order, “Mystic River,” “Cold Mountain,” “Big Fish” and “House of Sand and Fog.”

“Invariably, we’re the first to get odds up, and invariably, we offer the biggest selection of bets,” said Stuart Doyle, chief betting officer at BetWWTS.com, an Antigua-based firm that takes primarily sports bets.

This year’s overwhelming favorite for a best picture nomination is “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King,” according to odds posted at http://www.BetWWTS.com. It’s such a lock, in fact, that a bettor will win a scant $1 for each $20 wagered if the film is nominated.

But with the advent of legal online betting, offshore companies not only take bets on who will win but on who will be nominated.

YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS

Story Tools


Copyright 2003 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

You can even bet on whether the movie gets more or fewer than 9.5 Oscar nominations.

LOS ANGELES, California (Hollywood Reporter) — Las Vegas has been disseminating odds on who will win Oscars for years, though actual betting on the outcome of the annual Academy Awards contest isn’t allowed there.

Doyle said the site boasts only about 50 users who regularly bet on movie box office performances each week, making that aspect of its business more an attention getter than a profit center

“How to Choose the Right Sportsbook!”

Often these website owners know nothing about betting, do not hold accounts with the sportsbooks they are advertising and have not researched the companies they are involved with.

Happy betting!

You are keeping your money in an account online.

If you have already have an account with a sportsbook watch out for lapses in customer service and slowness of payment – these can be signs that the company could be in trouble.

So you have decided to start betting online – or maybe you just want to find a new trustworthy sportsbook – what do you need to look out for?

This article was posted on October 22, 2004

It is not that easy finding a reputable sportsbook – partly because the web is populated by website owners who will sing the praises of a sportsbook or casino simply because they earn revenue from signing up customers via an affiliate program. These vary quite a bit from book to book. Options should be available that are ‘free’ or where the sportsbook absorbs the charges. King

I would say that US bettors are at most risk since they are generally forced to bet at offshore sportsbooks due to legality issues. But ask yourself ; “how easy is it to get access to my money and how much does it cost?” . It is, therefore, critical that those US customers put in the research before signing up.

The UK has a number of established books including William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral, and Victor Chandler. Therefore you should think of the sportsbook you are considering as a bank – a place that you intend to keep funds long term.

<< Back to “Recreation And Sports” Index

So what do you look for:

“How to Choose the Right Sportsbook!”

 by: Daniel B.

Well I am in a position to speak from some experience – I did at one time hold accounts with about sixty bookmakers in Europe, UK, Australia and offshore – the latter catering mainly to the US market.

Find out if the sportsbook is part of a larger group of companies. Sometimes this means added solidity.

What are the deposit and withdrawal options and the associated charges. The offshore books with whom I work are top grade but it is in the offshore environment that problems occasionally occur. I also like SportingBet (www.SBSportsbook.com) who take US customers and cater for global sports.

Not all the above are critical – but help towards finding a secure book. I have had at least three online sportsbooks go broke on me – luckily my losses were kept to a few thousand dollars – that may sound a lot but it could have been a lot worse.

Read press articles as opposed to reviews – reviews are usually written by the sportsbook’s marketing team.

Test run the software by joining and playing for free – most sportsbooks offer this facility.

Find out if your funds are insured or separated in ESCROW accounts so that if the sportsbook company goes under – your funds are still safe.

Find out if the sportsbook is independently audited.

How long has the operation been online – three to four years is usually a good marker as a minimum.

Test out the customer services to see if they meet your standards or the standards they promise you.

If you know about betting already, then check some of their odds and lines – are they in keeping with what you would expect? Some less scrupulous sportsbooks offer very attractive prices to lure unsuspecting bettors